… how else could the market innovate enough to create a breathable toilet nozzle?

Here is a video I ran across which presents a few concepts in a simple and more relatable way for the slower ones in the group (Keegan).
Here is the powerpoint to the presentation Barry and I gave at the 2011 International Students for Liberty Conference. We hope this may help others become more effective on their college campus. I am going to continue to scour the internet looking for a recording of our presentation and will post it if I find it. Enjoy!
We brought in our first campus discussion in style, once again, with Islamophobia. Thanks to the many who attended!
UNR SFL tries once again to host a fundraiser for the American Lung Association but gets denied because tobacco is immoral (but, you know, getting $3200 worth of catering right before this request is totally legit).
… 23 hours in solitary confinement.
… not being allowed to exercise.
… anti-depressant medication being forcefully administered.
… carpet burns from the heavy blankets.
… no pillows or personal belongings.
… stripping to your underwear before bed
… not being allowed to have a blanket over your head.
… a light on in the prison cell 24 hours a day.
… a guard checking on you and waiting for a reply every 5 minutes.
… being shackled hand and foot during all visits.
… only being allowed to sleep during certain hours.
… becoming psychologically impaired due to the solitude.
… Amnesty International decrying abuse.
… doing this for 7 months and counting.
… having no trial yet.
This is happening to a US citizen who saw immoral activity and decided to report it after multiple attempts to try and stop it. Google Bradley Manning.
The UNR Students for Liberty have been busy coming up with yet another fantastic lineup of discussions, events, and even some surprise experiments this semester. If you find a topic or event that interests you, come and join us as we discuss them every other Thursday at 6:00PM in the JCSU.
Discussion: “Islamophobia”
Is Islam dangerous? Is it used to advance political means? Can it be both? Let’s hear it!
Thursday, February 10th – 6PM – JCSU 320
RSVP – CAL

Event: “ABOLISH ASUN 2 – Come and Get Your Fees Back”
$4,000 …. absolutely wasted.
Tuesday, February 15th – Hilliard Plaza – All Day Long
RSVP – CAL

Conference: “International Students for Liberty Conference”
Nominated for Event of the Year
Thursday, Feb. 17 – Sunday, Feb. 20 – Washington DC

Discussion: “Intellectual Property – Resolved”
A topic of hot debate within the club and abroad – is it necessary for innovation or damaging to creativity? Can somebody legitimately own an idea that is exclusively granted to them for their own use? Can someone own something that doesn’t exist? We will be showing clips from The Social Network to guide discussion.
Thursday, February 24th – 6PM – JCSU 320
RSVP – CAL

Discussion: “The WikiWorld – Information Privacy and the State”
Is there such a thing as state secrets and can/should they be enforced? Should we even be an official mirror of Wikileaks?
Thursday, March 3rd – 6PM – JCSU 320
RSVP – CAL

Discussion: “Human Life”
Abortion, life support, healthcare, brain death, organ donation, organ markets, and the taboos of cannibalism and necrophilia are all varying topics regarding the sanctity of human life. Where did such an idea come from? What are the implications?
Thursday, March 31st – 6PM – JCSU 320
RSVP – CAL
Discussion: “Private Slavery vs Public Slavery”
The private ownership of people was not only abolished but is nearly universally viewed to be wrong on all accounts. But what about the public ownership of people? Jurors, tax payers, debtors, and prisoners will we be related to this campus discussion.
Thursday, April 14th – 6PM – JCSU 320
RSVP – CAL
Discussion: “Pseudoscience”
We’ve all heard about this, but is there something wrong with it? Why or why not?
Thursday, April 28th – 6PM – JCSU 320
RSVP – CAL
Wikileaks has released a bundle of diplomatic cables regarding the situation in Egypt. Some of these are quite shocking, like the hanging of dissidents by their arms for weeks to trafficking children for organ harvesting. No wonder they are shutting off the internet…
New cable on Egyption police brutality
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/01/09CAIRO79.html
Mubarak private briefing for senator Lieberman
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/02/09CAIRO326.html
“Welcome to Egypt, General Schwartz–here’s what’s really going on”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/03/09CAIRO549.html
“Welcome to Washington, President Mubarack…”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/05/09CAIRO874.html
Egyption cable: “Military will ensure transfer of power…”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/07/09CAIRO1468.html
Cable: “Mubarak’s terror against writers, bloggers and journalists”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/07/09CAIRO1447.html
Cable: “Egypt’s abuse of Emergency Laws”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/01/10CAIRO64.html
Cable: “police brutality continues to be a pervasive, daily occurrence in Egypt”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/01/10CAIRO147.html
Cable: “police brutality continues to be a pervasive, daily occurrence in Egypt”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/01/10CAIRO147.html
Cable: “Welcome to Egypt, FBI director…here’s what’s going on”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO179.html
Cable: “Welcome to Egypt, Admiral… here’s what’s going on.”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO181.html
Cable: “A new round of political arrests…”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO197.html
Cable: “10 Yemeni children were trafficked to Egypt for organ harvesting”
http://wikileaks.ch/reldate/2011-01-28_0.html
Cable: “Shin Bet talks Gaza economics…”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10TELAVIV413.html
Cable: “Rogue Egyptian priests feed US adoption racket”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO344.html
Cable: “Hamas will accept the 1967 border with Israel”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10DOHA70.html
”The Egyptian ‘people blame America’ now for their plight under Mubarak.”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10DOHA71.html
Cable: “thousands of Egyptian military officers trained by US”
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO257.html
Cable: Egypt detained Christian blogger for criticizing Islam
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO235.html
Cable: Egypt ‘displeased’ with US human rights views
http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2010/02/10CAIRO253.html
Egypt: “Police will round up 40 to 50 suspects and hang them by their arms from the ceiling for weeks”
http://is.gd/WRu0ha
Cairo cables index
http://wikileaks.ch/origin/106_0.html?1
Cable: “Torture and police brutality in Egypt are endemic and widespread”
http://is.gd/WSIcnI
Egypt – Evidence of torture and repression by Mubarak´s Police
http://is.gd/EYVN6W
January 22nd has been designated by many pro-life groups to raise awareness regarding the issue of abortion and the sanctity of human life. An article on Lew Rockwell entitled Pro-Lifers for Mass Murder highlighted the hypocrisy many members within these groups have when it comes to their ardent opposition to abortions but their complete approval in the actions the State takes to slaughter people over seas. Though comparing the murderous activities of war to that of abortion is ridiculous and intellectually dishonest, I would like to extend and broaden the hypocrisy claim given in the article by describing members within these groups who feel that designating rights at the expense of other people is wrong, such as providing ‘free’ healthcare or welfare to some people at the expense of others, but find that doing so with an unborn child is completely justified.
The abortion debate can be summed up into the notion of private property rights. The uterus is just as much as someone’s private property as a house. If one were to leave their front door open, say by mistake or to merely let in some fresh air, and one comes downstairs to find a bum sitting on the couch, a home owner is fully within their right to kick ‘em out. Right? Even if by kicking him/her out of the house directly causes that bum to die, one cannot possibly be obligated or be responsible for him and be coerced into housing and feeding him until he is back on his feet. By forcing a woman to bear a child, pro-life proponents seeking government enforcement are positively and forcefully designating rights to the child at the expense of someone else, in this case the mother. This is the same reason why positively assigning healthcare rights or welfare rights through coercive means to some people at the expense of other people is equally wrong.
I’d like to hear some input from some of you regarding this argument, but if we are to believe that we own ourselves, our actions, and the things which we acquire when performing these actions, then why must this be foregone when a unwelcome guest implants itself in the body?
Last week I participated in a competition where a local business was offering promotional prizes to customers who were able to drive people to their Facebook page. Initially interested in winning the prize, the competition quickly began to evolve into an experiment which I found so enjoyable, I thought the readership would like to hear about this as well.
The Competition
The objective was to make a post on the company’s facebook wall and get as many people as you could find to “like” your comment. The person who gets the most “likes” on their comment wins the grand prize which is a $300 Go Pro HD video camera and a $60 – $70 lift ticket to a local ski resort. There were many consolation prizes as well. In order for somebody to be able to “like” your comment, one must first become a “fan” of the company. When one becomes a “fan” of a facebook page, it essentially allows the company the ability to post updates, specials, and other promotions on your personal feed. This competition was primarily designed to increase their internet presence on Facebook. Below is a screenshot of the official listing:

The Contestants
I heard about this competition through an acquaintance who was, unfortunately for them, recruiting me to “like” their comment on the company’s wall. After being inundated by several different people to “like” their particular comment, I did so begrudgingly (I thought their facebook account was hijacked at first) and is where I began to explore the potential possibilities of also entering the competition after seeing the listing for it (above). The two people who were blowing away the competition were the two people who asked me to “like” their comment (they are a couple and were entering the competition together). After examining their Facebook walls, I quickly determined that if I was going to compete with these people, I would need to be as tough or tougher on my family and friends as they were. Examine the extent to which they were promoting this competition on their facebook wall (srs business):
Don’t forget the boyfriend’s wall!
Or the event invite they created together…
Or the video they made pushing their friends to merely click on their link…
The links they were trying to get people to “like” were (notice the number of “likes” – increasing this number is the competition):

and the boyfriend’s:
Suffice to say, they lived and breathed this competition for 3 days straight constantly haggling all their friends and acquaintances to click on their link. There was never a point I checked facebook when either one, or both of them, were not online and active. Deciding if I was still going to try and compete against these people, I needed to consider the amount of time and effort they are putting into the project and if I was going to be able to beat them. Another disadvantage I had was that I heard about the competition about a half a day after they did, which gave them over 12 extra hours to rally people than I did.
The Process
The process in which I was going to finally beat them required an economic calculation that we as humans do so quickly and so frequently we rarely stop to consider or give it much thought. As we illustrated in the Tragedy of the Trojes event, in a priceless system, where the costs of goods and services are hidden from the consumer, another human resource must be traded instead: human time and energy. The grand prize in this example was a priceless good since the ability to earn it was not through an exchange of money, but instead an exchange of human energy.
I concluded that my time, my friends (human capital (not to sound cold or anything, but “pulling a favor” is merely an exchange in the capital one has with a friend)), and my energy was not worth the amount of time required to earn that camera or even the other prizes. Just as a business calculates the cost of undergoing an “in-house” project and deciding that it may be economical to outsource critical components of it to people who’s time is less valuable, so I calculated the cost and determined to outsource the “liking” of my link primarily to India (read some of the random comments they left me for a good laugh):
Most have probably heard of outsourcing, but rarely do I find people who know how to actually do it. Well, enter Amazon Mechanical Turk. This service “… give[s] businesses and developers access to an on-demand, scalable workforce. Workers select from thousands of tasks and work whenever it’s convenient.”. By creating a simple listing, I was able to levy the power of human beings from across the planet to perform a task that was not worth it for me to do:

Offering 2 cents a like to anyone who would click on my link, I was quickly inundated with nearly 100 people “liking” my comment in the very first night. The people who I was now targeting were getting extremely nervous, and began messaging me with all kinds of questions with how I was doing it. After giving them no clue, they doubled their efforts and tried to pair off their friendships with the global community of humans on Amazon:
The Result
I didn’t post a single link, haggle a single friend, or make a single video regarding this competition and wound up with the most likes and won first place in the contest. During the competition, I would drop the listing to give them some hope to keep trying before I would re-list it again (because I’m evil like that). After increasing the pay slightly and modifying my listing’s keywords, I was able to gather 10 likes every 5 minutes. But winnning the competition in and of itself is not enough to make an article on Students for Liberty. It wasn’t until they found out by asking one of the Turkers how I paid them did it begin to get interesting. Although I cannot personally vouch for their initial reaction to the epiphany, I think anyone could gather that they were super pissed. Livid. Extremely ticked off. Whatever you want to describe it. They posted their discoveries on the company’s wall with the intent to disqualify, and it is with this comment I am sharing this and the economic principle I am trying to pass:

In case you can’t read it clearly in the screenshot:
To take the lead in facebook contests, it looks like you don’t have to post events, send mass messages to all your friends and family, create a cute video with your dogs, or constantly update your status to talk about Snowbomb to get people to help you. You just have to pay people to like your post.
What a sad thing to say. Paying people to “like” your post, to build your house, to work on your car, to defend you in court, to cook your food, to operate on your heart, to design your bridges, and to manufacture your electronics is the very essence of human achievement. My time and my friendships are worth more than haggling them to click on random links. My time is worth more than learning how to engineer my vehicle, mine and refine the gasoline to put in it, mold the tires, and combine all the other components just to merely build a car, let alone to “like” a Facebook comment. Modernity and human achievement is a result of this miraculous voluntary interaction between one another, and to hate it and seek to regulate/prohibit/disqualify it is wrong and must be stopped if we are to live together peacefully on this little planet we call home.
In conclusion, I spent $7.16 for a prize package worth nearly $400.
(It should be noted that the company also gave her the grand prize as well, after being placed in such an awkward position by their certain revelation of outsourcing.)









