… nine funding caps compelled me …
When I was referred once again to another edition of the CK brah’s literary masterpiece from the VisLupis kiddies, I was ecstatic and dumfounded. Ecstatic in the fact that the inherent problems of ASUN are being illustrated through our newest campaign of showing people how terrible it is, and dumfounded in the fact that the same people who criticized us when we tried illuminating the problems through the START campaign are now suddenly agreeing with the fundamentals of our platform.
But, as mentioned earlier, this is the season of giving. Below you will find my five page report I gave to the club commission when my duty as club commissioner was completed. Included in this document you will find my concerns that the CK-tards have brought up just recently: the system is inherently broken and the policies the commission seek only make matters worse. No other commissioner, to my knowledge, submitted anything when I wrote this last year. I was never contacted when this year’s funding policies were drafted even though I requested to be in attendance.
So, as I gobble down catered meals on the backs of students like myself who are forced into an inherently flawed system, I feel justified by illustrating the inherit, unrepairable problems with “their” student government, the institution of government itself, and with the hopes that future students may be spared hundreds of dollars: that one day, a flawed system can be ended.
I hope you enjoy this more than the trash can did in the ASUN offices. I also hope this shows all the critics who constantly bombard myself and the members of the UNR Students for Liberty that, yes, we have tried to give constructive criticism and solutions to your own problems, and no, you guys don’t give two cents so quit pretending like you do by inviting us to your meetings to patronize us and waste our time.
But I think I should be very clear: this is not a failure of the individuals in government , but it is a problem with government and democracy in and of itself. Hayek sums it up best when he states: “This does not mean that the majority of people have low moral standards it merely means that the largest group of people whose values are very similar are the people with low standards. It is, as it were, the lowest common denominator which unites the largest number of people.” A democratic system is bound to produce sub-par results, because these results are the only things a large majority of people can agree upon.
Have a Merry Christmas! (If you have limited time, start reading page 3)